Wood v Waddington [2015]

Wood v Waddington [2015] EWCA Civ 538 is significant case in property law, particularly in relation to the acquisition of easements under Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA). The Court of Appeal, led by Lewison LJ, reversed the earlier decision of Morgan J in Wood v Waddington [2014], allowing the appeal of Mr and Mrs Wood, who claimed two rights of way over Mr Waddington's land.

The first argument presented by the Woods was that clause 12.3.3 of the transfer document expressly granted them the right of way. The clause stated that the property was sold "subject to and with the benefit of all liberties, privileges, and advantages of a continuous nature now used or enjoyed by or over the Property". However, the court rejected this argument. Lewison LJ clarified that rights of way are not "continuous" easements because they require human activity, unlike continuous easements such as rights of light or support. Therefore, clause 12.3.3 could not be interpreted as granting the rights of way claimed.

The Woods' second argument, relying on Section 62 LPA 1925, was successful. Section 62 operates to pass certain rights that have been exercised over retained land unless a contrary intention is expressed. In this case, the court found that visible signs of tracks and vehicular use were sufficient to establish that the rights of way were both "continuous and apparent" in the sense required by the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows. The use of the track once per month was considered sufficient to show apparent and regular use.

The court rejected Mr Waddington's argument that Section 62 should not apply due to a contrary intention being expressed in the transfer. Specifically, although certain rights of way had been expressly granted or reserved, the court held that this did not exclude the operation of Section 62 to confer additional rights that were not limited to those explicitly stated in the conveyance. This emphasised that Section 62 can operate to grant broader rights than those contained in the written terms of the conveyance.

The court considered the scope of the rights acquired under Section 62. For the first route, while vehicular use was proven, the right extended to use on foot and horseback, although not to driving animals. For the second route, although vehicular use was proven, the right claimed was only for use on foot and with animals. The court upheld these distinctions.

Finally, the court addressed the question of whether the rights to use the ways on horseback were limited to domestic use, given that no commercial livery business was operating at the time of the conveyance. The court held that there was no limitation to domestic purposes, and intensification of use for commercial purposes (e.g. a livery business) did not inherently amount to excessive use or create grounds for objection by the servient owner.

Wood v Waddington [2015] highlights the broad application of Section 62 LPA 1925 in the acquisition of easements, especially in cases where rights are continuous and apparent. The decision indicates that Section 62 can operate to grant rights not expressly mentioned in the transfer, provided that the exercise of those rights is visible and regular, even if limited in frequency. It also clarifies that changes in the nature of use (from domestic to commercial) do not necessarily infringe upon the granted easements, provided the intensity of use remains within reasonable limits.

Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.