Woolmington v DPP [1935]
Share
Woolmington v DPP [1935] UKHL 1 is one of the most significant cases in English criminal law that established the principle of the presumption of innocence across the Commonwealth. The case is most well-known for establishing the "golden thread" principle, which highlights the necessity for the prosecution to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases.
The case involved Reginald Woolmington, a 21-year-old farm laborer who shot and killed his 17-year-old wife, Violet, shortly after their separation. Woolmington claimed that the shooting was accidental, as he had only intended to scare her by threatening to take his own life in an attempt to reconcile. However, the prosecution charged him with murder. During his trial at the Taunton Assizes in January 1935, Woolmington presented his defense, claiming the gun had discharged unintentionally. Despite this, the jury failed to reach a verdict, and the case went to a retrial.
At the retrial, the judge directed the jury that it was Woolmington's burden to prove that the shooting was accidental, placing the presumption of guilt on him. Consequently, he was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. Woolmington's legal team appealed, arguing that the jury had been misdirected and that it was the prosecution's responsibility to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The case reached the House of Lords, where Viscount Sankey delivered the famous "golden thread" speech, asserting that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt, except in specific cases such as insanity or statutory exceptions. This ruling established that the burden of proof always lies with the prosecution, not the defendant, and any reasonable doubt must result in acquittal. The Lords quashed Woolmington's conviction, and he was released just days before his scheduled execution.
This case reaffirmed the presumption of innocence as a fundamental principle in criminal conviction. It ensures that the state cannot arbitrarily deprive individuals of their liberty or impose criminal sanctions without first proving their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This principle has had a profound impact on criminal law and has since become a cornerstone of criminal justice systems around the world.
The case involved Reginald Woolmington, a 21-year-old farm laborer who shot and killed his 17-year-old wife, Violet, shortly after their separation. Woolmington claimed that the shooting was accidental, as he had only intended to scare her by threatening to take his own life in an attempt to reconcile. However, the prosecution charged him with murder. During his trial at the Taunton Assizes in January 1935, Woolmington presented his defense, claiming the gun had discharged unintentionally. Despite this, the jury failed to reach a verdict, and the case went to a retrial.
At the retrial, the judge directed the jury that it was Woolmington's burden to prove that the shooting was accidental, placing the presumption of guilt on him. Consequently, he was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. Woolmington's legal team appealed, arguing that the jury had been misdirected and that it was the prosecution's responsibility to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The case reached the House of Lords, where Viscount Sankey delivered the famous "golden thread" speech, asserting that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt, except in specific cases such as insanity or statutory exceptions. This ruling established that the burden of proof always lies with the prosecution, not the defendant, and any reasonable doubt must result in acquittal. The Lords quashed Woolmington's conviction, and he was released just days before his scheduled execution.
This case reaffirmed the presumption of innocence as a fundamental principle in criminal conviction. It ensures that the state cannot arbitrarily deprive individuals of their liberty or impose criminal sanctions without first proving their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This principle has had a profound impact on criminal law and has since become a cornerstone of criminal justice systems around the world.
