Zamet v Hyman [1961]

Zamet v Hyman [1961] 3 All ER 933 addressed the issue of undue influence within the context of an engagement between a couple. The central dispute arose when, prior to marriage, the woman agreed to relinquish all claims to her husband's estate upon his death in exchange for £600. Subsequently, the husband's estate was valued at £10,000, leading the wife to seek the nullification of the agreement on the grounds of undue influence.

The court established key legal principles regarding fiduciary relationships and undue influence. It emphasised that the existence of a fiduciary relationship, which could give rise to undue influence, should not be presumed between engaged couples; instead, it must be proven. Furthermore, the court acknowledged that transactions that exhibit significant favouritism towards one party may serve as evidence of a fiduciary relationship, potentially leading to a presumption of undue influence. Additionally, the person benefiting from the agreement has the opportunity to rebut the presumption by demonstrating that the other party gave their full, free and informed consent to the arrangement.

The Court of Appeal, in dismissing the appeal and affirming the trial judge's decision in favour of the wife, underscored the presence of a presumption of undue influence that the appellants failed to disprove. The court referenced the extravagantly one-sided nature of the transaction, indicating a duty of full candour and protection owed by the husband to the wife within the engaged relationship.

Lord Evershed MR, in establishing a test for the presumption of undue influence, highlighted that in the context of engaged couples, the automatic assumption of a fiduciary relationship should be avoided. However, in cases where a transaction appears significantly favourable to one party, a fiduciary relationship may be inferred, placing a burden on the benefiting party to prove the voluntary and informed nature of the transaction.

Donovan LJ added to this perspective, suggesting that, in engagements, it should be proven rather than presumed that the disposition resulted from the abuse of confidence and trust. Nonetheless, affirmative evidence presented during the trial in Zamet v Hyman indicated the existence of a relationship of confidence between the parties.

The court, in assessing the current facts of the case, concluded that the wife's agreement to forgo a £10,000 estate in exchange for £600 was excessively one-sided, signifying a duty of protection owed by the husband. The presumption of undue influence remained unrebutted due to the lack of information provided to the wife and the absence of independent legal advice.

This case underscores that the presumption of undue influence hinges on the presence of a fiduciary relationship between the parties. For relationships like engaged couples, the existence of this relationship must be proven rather than assumed. The imbalance within the transaction itself can serve as evidence of such a fiduciary relationship.

The rationale for setting aside contracts for undue influence often revolves around the claimant's impaired consent to the agreement. The judgement of this case aligns with this rationale, asserting that the agreement stands if it can be proven that the claimant provided full, free and informed consent.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.