C-376/98 Germany v Parliament and Council [2000]

C-376/98 Germany v Parliament and Council [2000] ECR I-8419 revolves around the annulment of the Tobacco Advertising Directive, adopted under Article 95 EC (now Article 114 TFEU). In this legal dispute, Germany contested the validity of the Directive, arguing that its true purpose was to regulate public health—an area falling under the supporting competence of Article 138 TFEU—rather than genuinely promoting the operation of the internal market.

The outcome of the case resulted in the annulment of the Tobacco Advertising Directive on grounds of improper legal bases and a breach of the principle of conferral under Article 5(2) TEU. The judgment provides crucial insights into the interpretation and application of Article 95 EC, emphasising that measures adopted under this provision must authentically aim at improving the conditions for the establishment and functioning of the internal market.

The court's decision highlights that Article 95 EC does not grant a broad regulatory power for the internal market. Mere disparities between national rules and abstract risks to freedoms or competition are insufficient justifications for invoking Article 95 EC as a legal basis. The court stressed the necessity of assessing whether the distortion of competition targeted by the measure is appreciable, preventing the use of this provision for minor or negligible distortions.

Moreover, the judgment underscores that the Tobacco Advertising Directive, in this specific case, exceeded the scope of Article 114 TFEU. It applied not only to tradeable media (e.g. newspapers and magazines) but also to non-tradeable media, such as hotel and restaurant posters, parasols, and ashtrays. Additionally, the Directive failed to ensure free movement for compliant products, and advantages for advertising agencies in Member States without a ban were considered remote and indirect.

While the court acknowledged that certain regulations might lead to appreciable distortions, it concluded that a blanket ban, as imposed by the Directive, was not justified. The court also addressed the issue of partial annulment, emphasising that it was not feasible, as it would amount to amending the directive—a matter reserved for the legislative authority.

In summary, the case sets important precedents regarding the proper application of Article 95 EC (now Article 114 TFEU), emphasising the need for a genuine focus on improving the internal market conditions and the requirement to carefully assess the appreciability of distortions targeted by the regulatory measures.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.