C-176/12 Association de Médiation Sociale v Union Locale des Syndicats CGT [2014]

C-176/12 Association de Médiation Sociale v Union Locale des Syndicats CGT [2014]

C-176/12 Association de médiation sociale v Union locale des syndicats CGT [2014] ECR I-0000 is a notable EU law case that dealt with the protection of human rights in the European Union, focusing on workers' rights to information and consultation.

The case involved the interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, specifically Article 27, which guarantees workers the right to be guaranteed information and consultation in good time. This provision was implemented in part by the Information and Consultation Directive 2002 (2002/14/EC). The French Labour Code, specifically Article L. 1111-3, excluded workers with non-standard employment contracts from staff numbers used to determine legal thresholds for constituting bodies representing staff. The Union locale des syndicats CGT, a trade union, contended that this exclusion violated both the Charter and the Directive.

In the Advocate General's opinion, Advocate General Cruz Villalón opposed the direct applicability of the Charter. He expressed concerns that recognising specific economic and social rights could lead to the judicialisation of public policy, particularly in areas of significant budgetary importance.

The Court of Justice, in its Grand Chamber, held that the Directive's Article 2(d) and Article 3 defined who should be included in its scope and did not allow the exclusion of certain groups of workers when calculating the number of staff. However, the Court noted that the Charter's Article 27 was not precise enough to determine that national law could not exclude certain categories of workers.

The Court emphasised that while national law should be interpreted in conformity with EU law, this principle has limits. The obligation to refer to the content of a directive when interpreting domestic law is constrained by general principles of law, and it cannot lead to an interpretation contra legem.

Regarding Article 27 of the Charter, the Court reiterated that fundamental rights guaranteed in the EU legal order are applicable in all situations governed by EU law. However, the Court concluded that Article 27, by itself, cannot be invoked in a dispute between individuals to preclude the application of a national provision not in conformity with Directive 2002/14. The Court distinguished this case from Kücükdeveci, stating that Article 27 could not confer on individuals an individual right that they may invoke as such.

In summary, while the Directive was applicable and required the inclusion of certain workers for staff number calculations, the Court held that Article 27 of the Charter, by itself or in conjunction with the Directive, could not be invoked by individuals to challenge the national provision.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.