R v Goodfellow [1986]

R v Goodfellow [1986] 83 CAR 23 is an English criminal law case concerning the unlawful killing of another person, and it intersects with charges related to arson causing death by reckless conduct.

The appellant in this case was facing charges of arson and manslaughter. He intentionally set his own residence on fire, intending to create the false appearance of a petrol bomb attack. The motive behind this act was to generate circumstances that would lead to his relocation due to conflicts with neighbours. Tragically, the fire resulted in the deaths of his wife, son, and his son's girlfriend.

The jury was informed that the appellant could be found guilty of manslaughter if the unlawful act posed a recognisable risk of harm to another person, even if not serious, as long as all sober and reasonable people would acknowledge this risk. Importantly, the act did not have to be directly aimed at the victim as long as there was no fresh intervening cause between the act and the resulting death.

The jury was directed to determine if the appellant's actions created an obvious and serious risk of causing physical injury to someone. They also needed to be satisfied that, having recognised the risk, the appellant proceeded to take it. This instruction was based on the precedent set in R v Lawrence [1972].

Despite favourable instructions based on the Lawrence case, the appellant was convicted on multiple counts, including three counts of manslaughter, one count of arson, and one count of reckless arson endangerment. Following the convictions, the appellant appealed against the manslaughter and reckless arson endangerment charges.

The court held that the case could fall within either or both types of manslaughter. Regarding the Lawrence aspect, it was conceivable that the jury could have been satisfied that the appellant was acting in a manner that created an obvious and serious risk of causing physical injury and that, having recognised the risk, he proceeded to take it. The case was also deemed suitable for the "unlawful and dangerous act." The judge's instructions were considered correct, and the convictions for manslaughter were neither unsafe nor unsatisfactory.

In summary, R v Goodfellow involved a complex scenario where the appellant intentionally set fire to his home, leading to the deaths of three individuals. The court considered both the Lawrence-type case and the "unlawful and dangerous act" case, ultimately upholding the convictions for manslaughter and other related charges. The judgment reinforced the principles that intentional acts leading to a recognisable risk of harm, even if not directly aimed at the victim, can be considered as unlawful and dangerous acts resulting in manslaughter charges.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.