Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011]

Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011]

Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 is a significant English contract law case that delves into the nuanced realm of contract interpretation. The case reiterates and confirms the legal principle established in Wickman v Schuler [1973], emphasising the importance of aligning contractual interpretation with business common sense.

Rainy Sky, a ship-owning firm, entered into a contract with Jinse Shipbuilding for the purchase of vessels. The contract included an indemnity bond from Kookmin Bank, triggered in the event of insolvency. The bond stated that Rainy Sky was entitled to repayment "upon rejection of the Vessel… or upon a Total Loss of the Vessel". Rainy Sky, having made payments, called on the bond when Jinse faced insolvency. Kookmin argued that the bond only covered specific events and not insolvency. The central issue was the interpretation of the bond, specifically whether it covered repayment due to Jinse's insolvency.

In the High Court, Simon J ruled in favour of Rainy Sky, emphasising the term "all such sums" and deeming Kookmin's interpretation commercially unviable. However, the Court of Appeal, led by Patten LJ, supported Kookmin's interpretation, citing the word "such" and deeming it grammatically more likely. He emphasised that, despite being unfavourable to Rainy Sky, it was not commercially unreasonable.

The Supreme Court, in Lord Clarke's judgment, allowed Rainy Sky's appeal. The court affirmed the principle that in cases of ambiguity, the interpretation most consistent with business common sense should prevail. There is no need to prove an alternative interpretation is entirely unreasonable.

The Supreme Court upheld the principle that, in interpreting contracts, the approach aligns with business common sense. This means choosing an interpretation that is commercially reasonable when there is ambiguity. Lord Clarke acknowledged that where language is unambiguous, the court must apply it, regardless of how commercially unreasonable the result might be. The Court emphasised adopting a more commercial construction when a clause is capable of two meanings, especially when neither meaning flouts common sense.

The decision clarified the importance of business common sense in interpreting ambiguous contract terms. Parties, in ambiguous cases, may now consider presenting expert evidence on the degree of commercial reasonableness associated with a particular interpretation. The ruling reinforced that, even in cases of ambiguity, the chosen interpretation should align with the broader commercial context.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.