Shuttleworth v Cox Bros and Co (Maidenhead) [1927]

Shuttleworth v Cox Bros and Co (Maidenhead) [1927] 1 Ch 154 is a UK company law case that specifically deals with the alteration of a company's constitution.

Cox Bros and Co (Maidenhead) originally had a provision in its articles of association that appointed a board of directors for life. However, the company proposed to amend its articles, allowing a director to lose their position if the other directors, by written request, asked for their resignation. Mr Shuttleworth, a director targeted by these changes, brought a claim arguing that the alteration of the articles was not bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the alteration of the articles was bona fide for the benefit of the company and was, therefore, valid. The court reaffirmed the bona fide test laid down in Sidebottom v Kershaw, Leese & Co [1920].

Bankes LJ, in his judgment, emphasised that the test is whether the alteration of the articles, in the opinion of the shareholders, was for the benefit of the company. He discussed the possibility of the court treating the conduct of shareholders like the verdict of a jury, allowing the court to intervene if the alteration is so oppressive or extravagant that no reasonable person could consider it for the benefit of the company. However, he disagreed with the view that the court's opinion must always prevail when there is a difference with shareholders.

Bankes LJ expressed that if the action of the shareholders is either incapable of being for the benefit of the company or is such that no reasonable person could consider it for the benefit of the company, then the court may intervene. However, in this case, he found that the alteration was not incapable of being for the benefit of the company, and reasonable people could consider it as such.

The judgment established one of the two limbs of the modern-day bona fide intentions test, focusing on the objective assessment of whether the alteration is capable of being considered for the benefit of the company. The subjective limb was later established in Greenhalgh v Ardene Cinemas (No 2) [1946]. The bona fide intentions test is a combination of these two methods of assessment.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.