Your Cart

McDonald v City of Chicago [2010]

McDonald v City of Chicago [2010] 561 US 742 is a landmark Supreme Court case clarifying that the Second Amendment's protection of an individual's right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments through incorporation via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

This decision extended the reach of Second Amendment protections beyond federal jurisdiction and established a precedent that affected gun rights in regard to state and local governments across the United States. This case was significant because it clarified and expanded upon the Second Amendment's applicability to state and local gun control laws. It also led to the reevaluation of various state and local gun control regulations to ensure compliance with the Second Amendment.

In 2008, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal decision in District of Columbia v Heller, which held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms for self-defence within the home, separate from any militia service. However, the Heller decision specifically addressed the District of Columbia, a federal jurisdiction, leaving unanswered questions about the applicability of the Second Amendment to state and local governments.

Otis McDonald, a resident of Chicago, Illinois, was one of several plaintiffs who challenged Chicago's restrictive handgun ban. Chicago, like the District of Columbia, had imposed strict regulations on handgun ownership, effectively prohibiting most residents from possessing handguns for self-defence.

McDonald's lawsuit argued that Chicago's handgun ban violated his Second Amendment rights, and it sought to extend the protections established in Heller to state and local jurisdictions. The case ultimately made its way to the US Supreme Court.

In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of McDonald and the other plaintiffs. The Court held that the Second Amendment's right to bear arms for self-defence, as articulated in Heller, applies to state and local governments through the incorporation doctrine.

The incorporation doctrine, established through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, ensures that fundamental rights recognised at the federal level are also applicable to state and local governments. In the McDonald decision, the Court concluded that the Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defence is one of these fundamental rights and, therefore, must also be respected by state and local governments.

As a result of the McDonald decision, Chicago's handgun ban was declared unconstitutional, and it established a precedent that extended the Second Amendment's protections against infringement by state and local governments across the United States. This decision has had a significant impact on gun control laws and litigation at the state and local levels, leading to numerous legal challenges to various firearms regulations.

Trusted by thousands of law students worldwide

Where are our students from?

Yale University

Council of Europe

Baker Mckenzie 

University of Chicago

Columbia University

New York University

University of Michigan 


University College London (UCL)

London School of Economics (LSE)

King’s College London (KCL)

University of London

University of Manchester

University of Zurich

University of York

Brandeis University

University of Exeter

University of Sheffield

Boston University

University of Washington

University of Leeds

University of Law

Royal Holloway, University of London 

Birkbeck, University of London

SOAS, University of London

University of Kent

University of Hull

Queen’s University Belfast

Toronto Metropolitan University

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

University of Buckingham

Your perfect companion for open-book and closed-book exams

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.


Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.


All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.