Your Cart

R v Rook [1993]

R v Rook [1993] 2 All ER 955 examined the requirement for an accused to successfully withdraw from a criminal enterprise in which they had initially participated. The key criterion emphasised was the necessity for unequivocal communication of withdrawal to other perpetrators.

A man hiring three individuals, including Rook, to kill his wife. However, on the day of the crime, Rook did not show up, and the wife was ultimately killed by the other two men. Rook was subsequently convicted of murder as part of a joint enterprise based on his alleged assistance and encouragement of the crime.

The central issue revolved around whether Rook's failure to appear on the day of the crime constituted effective withdrawal from the joint enterprise. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that Rook had not sufficiently withdrawn himself.

Lloyd LJ, delivering the judgment, emphasised that Rook's absence on the day of the crime did not meet the standard of unequivocal communication of withdrawal to the others involved. The court concluded that Rook had not done the minimum required to effectively withdraw from the criminal enterprise.

The judgment highlighted the significance of clear and unambiguous communication in the withdrawal process. Additionally, the court left open the question of whether unequivocal communication alone is adequate for withdrawal or if further steps must be taken to neutralise one's assistance in the commission of the crime.

Check out our exam-focused Criminal Law notes now.

Subscribe to UOL Case Bank for more exclusive content and case summaries.

Trusted by thousands of law students worldwide

Where are our students from?

Yale University

Council of Europe

Baker Mckenzie 

University of Chicago

Columbia University

New York University

University of Michigan 


University College London (UCL)

London School of Economics (LSE)

King’s College London (KCL)

University of London

University of Manchester

University of Zurich

University of York

Brandeis University

University of Exeter

University of Sheffield

Boston University

University of Washington

University of Leeds

University of Law

Royal Holloway, University of London 

Birkbeck, University of London

SOAS, University of London

University of Kent

University of Hull

Queen’s University Belfast

Toronto Metropolitan University

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

University of Buckingham

Your perfect companion for open-book and closed-book exams

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.


Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.


All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.