Jurisdiction refers to the legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. It determines which court system should properly adjudicate a dispute or a case, based on factors such as geography, subject matter, and the parties involved. The principles of jurisdiction under international law are foundational to understanding how states assert their legal authority over individuals, especially in matters of criminal law. These principles guide the exercise of jurisdiction in situations that cross borders, reflecting the complexity and interconnectedness of the international community.
Territorial Principle
The territorial principle is the most fundamental and widely accepted basis for jurisdiction. It allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over any crime committed within its territory, regardless of the nationality of the perpetrator or the victim. This principle is based on the sovereignty of states over their territory and is the least controversial, serving as the primary jurisdictional rule in international law.
Nationality Principle (Active Personality Principle)
The nationality principle allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over its nationals, regardless of where a crime is committed. This principle extends a state's legal reach beyond its borders, enabling it to prosecute its citizens for crimes committed abroad. This principle has been expanded in some jurisdictions to include permanent residents, reflecting a broader understanding of the social contract between individuals and the state.
Passive Personality Principle
The passive personality principle permits a state to exercise jurisdiction over foreign nationals who commit crimes against its citizens outside of its territory. This principle is grounded in the state's responsibility to protect its nationals. It is a form of extraterritorial jurisdiction that underscores the importance of national identity and the duty of a state to safeguard its citizens, even when they are abroad.
Protective Principle
The protective principle allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over foreign nationals for actions committed outside its territory that threaten the state's security or other vital interests. This principle is often invoked in cases related to national security, espionage, or other acts that, while occurring outside the state's borders, have serious implications for its safety and well-being.
Universality Principle
The universality principle is the most expansive, asserting that a state can exercise jurisdiction over certain crimes of universal concern, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, torture, and forced disappearances, regardless of where they were committed, the nationality of the perpetrator, or the nationality of the victim. This principle embodies the idea that some crimes are so heinous that their prosecution is a matter of international concern, obliging states to prosecute or extradite (aut dedere aut judicare) the accused to ensure justice is served.
These jurisdictional principles under international law reflect the balance between state sovereignty, the protection of national interests, and the global commitment to justice and human rights. No single principle has supremacy; rather, their application requires careful consideration of the specifics of each case, international treaties, and the principles of cooperation and respect for the sovereignty of other states. The overlapping and sometimes competing claims of jurisdiction necessitate cooperation and dialogue among states to address the challenges of prosecuting crimes that span multiple jurisdictions.
Check out our exam-focused Public International Law notes now.
