Your Cart

Robins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2007]

C-278/05 Robins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2007] represents a significant intersection of UK insolvency law, labour law, and EU law, focusing on the protection of employees' pension rights upon the insolvency of their employer. The case revolved around the adequacy of the UK's implementation of Directive 80/987/EEC (the Insolvency Directive), specifically Article 8, which concerns the protection of employees' entitlements in the event of their employer's insolvency.

Robins, who was employed by a now insolvent company, found himself facing significant reductions in his expected final salary pension benefits due to the insolvency of the pension scheme. He sought compensation, arguing that the UK had failed to provide the level of social protection for employees' pension entitlements as required by the Insolvency Directive. The question was whether the UK's measures, particularly the Financial Assistance Scheme established under the Pensions Act 2004 section 286, were sufficient to meet the Directive's requirements.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ), led by Judge Timmermans, clarified several key points in its judgment. First, the ECJ determined that EU member states are not required to ensure pension funds are fully guaranteed in the event of insolvency. Instead, member states could mandate pension schemes to purchase insurance to protect pension benefits, offering an alternative method of protection.

However, the ECJ found that the protection provided by the UK, particularly through its Financial Assistance Scheme, was insufficient. With potential benefits as low as 20% of the entitlement, the scheme did not constitute 'protection' within the meaning of Article 8 of the Insolvency Directive. This indicated a failure in the proper implementation of the Directive by the UK.

The judgment also addressed the circumstances under which a Member State might incur liability for failing to implement the Directive correctly. Following the principle established in Brasserie du Pecheur SA v Germany, the ECJ indicated that liability would depend on a manifest and grave disregard for the limits of the Member State's discretion. The national court would need to consider the clarity and precision of Article 8 and the degree of discretion afforded to national authorities in determining the level of protection required.

This case highlights the complex interplay between national law and EU directives, particularly in the context of employee rights and social protection in insolvency situations. It underscores the necessity for Member States to ensure that their national measures effectively safeguard employees' entitlements to the extent required by EU law. Additionally, Robins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions serves as a reminder of the potential liability that Member States face for inadequately implementing EU directives, emphasising the need for careful consideration of the obligations imposed by EU law.

Check out our high-performance Labour Law, Company Law, and EU Law notes now.

Subscribe to UOL Case Bank for more exclusive content and case summaries.

Trusted by thousands of law students worldwide

Where are our students from?

Yale University

Council of Europe

Baker Mckenzie 

University of Chicago

Columbia University

New York University

University of Michigan 


University College London (UCL)

London School of Economics (LSE)

King’s College London (KCL)

University of London

University of Manchester

University of Zurich

University of York

Brandeis University

University of Exeter

University of Sheffield

Boston University

University of Washington

University of Leeds

University of Law

Royal Holloway, University of London 

Birkbeck, University of London

SOAS, University of London

University of Kent

University of Hull

Queen’s University Belfast

Toronto Metropolitan University

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

University of Buckingham

Your perfect companion for open-book and closed-book exams

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.


Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.


All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.