Your Cart

Arguments for and against Criminalising Public Order Crimes

Public order crimes, also known as victimless crimes, involve acts that do not directly harm the person or property of another, but are considered to harm the community or society in general. These can include drug use, prostitution, public drunkenness, and gambling, among others. The arguments for and against the criminalisation of public order crimes are deeply rooted in differing views on morality, individual freedom, public health, and the role of government.

Arguments for Criminalising Public Order Crimes

Protection of social norms and morality: Proponents argue that public order laws are necessary to uphold societal norms and moral standards. They believe that certain behaviours, if left unchecked, can erode the moral fabric of society.

Prevention of harm to society: Even if these crimes do not harm individuals directly, it's argued they have indirect negative effects on society, such as increased healthcare costs, reduced quality of life in neighbourhoods, and higher rates of more serious crimes.

Maintenance of public order and safety: Public order crimes can lead to disorder and make public spaces feel unsafe or unwelcoming to the general population. Laws against such behaviours are seen as essential for maintaining public safety and order.

Protecting the vulnerable: Some argue that crimes like drug use and prostitution often involve exploitation of vulnerable populations. Criminalisation is seen as a way to protect these individuals from exploitation and harm.

Arguments against Criminalising Public Order Crimes

Individual freedom and autonomy: Critics argue that adults should have the right to make their own choices about personal behaviour, as long as they do not harm others. Criminalising victimless acts infringes on personal freedoms.

Ineffectiveness and unintended consequences: There is evidence to suggest that criminalising these behaviours does not reduce their occurrence and can lead to unintended negative consequences, such as the creation of black markets, increased violence, and the overburdening of the criminal justice system.

Disproportionate impact on marginalised groups: Enforcement of public order laws often disproportionately affects marginalised communities, including people of colour, the homeless, and low-income populations, leading to accusations of discrimination and exacerbation of social inequalities.

Cost and resource allocation: Enforcing laws against public order crimes requires significant public resources that critics argue could be better spent on prevention, treatment, and addressing the root causes of problematic behaviour (such as poverty, lack of education, and substance abuse issues).

Potential for better alternatives: Opponents of criminalisation advocate for alternative approaches, such as decriminalisation, regulation, and harm reduction strategies. They argue these can more effectively address the issues associated with public order crimes while minimising negative societal impacts.

The debate over public order crimes is complex and involves balancing individual rights against the perceived needs and well-being of society. The most effective approach likely varies by context and requires considering the specific nature of each behaviour, the goals of society, and the potential impacts of different policies.

Check out our exam-focused Public Law notes now.

Trusted by thousands of law students worldwide

Where are our students from?

Yale University

Council of Europe

Baker Mckenzie 

University of Chicago

Columbia University

New York University

University of Michigan 


University College London (UCL)

London School of Economics (LSE)

King’s College London (KCL)

University of London

University of Manchester

University of Zurich

University of York

Brandeis University

University of Exeter

University of Sheffield

Boston University

University of Washington

University of Leeds

University of Law

Royal Holloway, University of London 

Birkbeck, University of London

SOAS, University of London

University of Kent

University of Hull

Queen’s University Belfast

Toronto Metropolitan University

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Your perfect companion for open-book and closed-book exams

Diagrams and Charts

Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

Clear and Succinct Definitions

Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

Statutory Provisions

Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

Case Summaries

We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

Rules and Exceptions

Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.


Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

Case Law

Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

Law Essay Guide

You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

Problem Question Guide

We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

Structured Explanations

Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

Legal Research

You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.


All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.